Wait For It…The Mongols!: Crash Course World History #17

Hi I’m John Green; this is Crash Course
World History and today we’re gonna discuss… wait for it… THE MONGOLS. So you probably have a picture of the Mongols
in your head. Yes, that’s the picture: brutal, bloodthirsty, swarthy, humorously mustachioed
warriors riding the plains, wearing fur, eating meat directly off the bone, saying, “Bar bar
bar bar bar bar bar”. In short, we imagine the Mongol empire as stereotypically barbarian.
And that’s not entirely wrong. But if you’ve been reading recent world
history textbooks like we here at Crash Course have, you might have a different view of the
Mongols, one that emphasizes the amazing speed and success of their conquests — how they
conquered more land in 25 years than the Romans did in 400. How they controlled more than
11 million contiguous square miles. And you may even have read that the Mongols basically
created nations like Russia and even Korea. One historian has even claimed that the Mongols,
“smashed the feudal system” and created international law. Renowned for their religious
tolerance, the Mongols, in this view, created the first great free trade zone, like a crazy
medieval Eurasian NAFTA. And that’s not entirely wrong either. Stupid truth, always
resisting simplicity. [theme music] So remember herders? We talked about them
back in episode one as an alternative to hunting and gathering or agriculture. Here are the
key things to remember: 1. Nomads aren’t Jack Kerouac: They don’t
just go on like random road trips. They migrate according to climate conditions so they can
feed their flocks. 2. Nomads don’t generally produce manufactured
goods which means they need to trade, so they almost always live near settled people. And 3. Because they live in generally live
close to nature and in harsh conditions, pastoralists tend to be tougher than diamond-plated differential
calculus. Like, think of the Huns, or the Xiongnu. Or the Mongols. Okay, Stan. That’s
enough. Back to me. Stan. I AM THE STAR OF THIS SHOW NOT THE MONGOLS!!! Hi. Sorry about
that. Right, so one last thing: pastoral people
also tend to be more egalitarian, especially where women are concerned. Paradoxically,
when there’s less to go around, humans tend to share more, and when both men and women
must work for the social order to survive, there tends to be less patriarchal domination
of women. Although Mongol women rarely went to war. I can’t tell your gender. I mean
you’ve got the pants, but then you also have the floopity flop, so… That’s the
technical term, by the way. I’m a historian. If you had to choose a pastoral nomadic group
to come out of central Asia and dominate the world, you probably wouldn’t have chosen
the Mongols. Because for most of the history we’ve been discussing, they just hung out
in the foothills bordering the Siberian forest, mixing herding and hunting, quietly getting
really good at archery and riding horses. Also, the Mongols were much smaller than other
pastoral groups like the Tatars or the Uyghurs. And not to get like all Great Man History
on you or anything, but the reason the Mongols came to dominate the world really started with one
guy, Genghis Khan. Let’s go to the Thought Bubble. The story goes that Genghis or Chingus Khan
was born around 1162 with the name Temüjin to a lowly clan. His father was poisoned to
death, leaving Temüjin under the control of his older brothers, one of whom he soon
killed during an argument. By 19 he was married to his first and most important wife, Börte,
who was later kidnapped. This was pretty common among the Mongols, Temüjin’s mom had also
been kidnapped. In rescuing his wife, Temüjin proved his military mettle and he soon became
a leader of his tribe, but uniting the Mongol confederations required a civil war, which
he won, largely thanks to two innovations. First, he promoted people based on merit rather
than family position, and second, he brought lower classes of conquered people into his
own tribe while dispossessing the leaders of the conquered clans. Thus he made the peasants
love him. The rich hated him — but they didn’t matter anymore, because they were
no longer rich. With these two building block policies, Temüjin
was able to win the loyalty of more and more people and in 1206 he was declared the Great
Khan, the leader of all the Mongols. How? Well, the Mongols chose their rulers in a
really cool way. A prospective ruler would call a general council called a kurultai,
and anyone who supported his candidacy for leadership would show up on their horses,
literally voting with their feet. Past John: Mr. Green, Mr. Green! But horses
don’t have feet they have hooves. I hate you, Me From the Past. Also, NO INTERRUPTING
THE THOUGHT BUBBLE! After uniting the Mongols, Genghis Khan went
on to conquer a lot of territory. By the time he died in his sleep in 1227, his empire stretched
from the Mongol homeland in Mongolia all the way to the Caspian Sea. Thanks, Thought Bubble. So that’s a pretty good looking empire,
and sure a lot of it was pasture or mountains or desert, but the Mongols did conquer a lot
of people, too. And in some ways with Genghis’ death, the empire was just getting started.
His son Ögedei Khan expanded the empire even more. And Genghis’ grandson Möngke was
the Great Khan in 1258 when Baghdad, the capitol of the Abbasid Empire, fell to the Mongols.
And another of Genghis’ grandsons, Kublai Khan, conquered the Song Dynasty in China
in 1279. And if the Mamluks hadn’t stopped another of Genghis’ grandsons at the battle
of Ain Jalut, they probably would have taken all of North Africa. Genghis Khan sure had
a lot of grandkids… It must be time for the open letter. An Open Letter To Genghis Khan’s Descendants.
But first, let’s check what’s in the secret compartment today. Oh. A noisemaker and champagne
poppers? Stan, you know I suck at these. What’s all this for? Ohhh, it’s because it’s a BIRTHDAY PARTY!!
YAY. Happy birthday to Genghis Khan’s descendants. How do I know it’s your birthday, Genghis
Khan’s descendants? Because every day is your birthday. Because right now on the planet
Earth, there are 16 million direct descendants of Genghis Khan, meaning that every day is
the birthday of 43,000 of them. So, good news, Genghis Khan: Your empire might be gone, but
your progeny lives on. And on, and on, and on. HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!! Best wishes, John Green Unfortunately for the Mongols, those guys
weren’t always working together, because Genghis Khan failed to create a single political
unit out of his conquests. Instead, after Genghis’ death, the Mongols were left with
four really important Empires called Khanates: The Yuan Dynasty in China, the Il-Khanate
in Persia, the Chagatai Khanate in Central Asia, and the Khanate of the Golden Horde
in Russia. If you remember all the way back to the Hellenistic
period, this is similar to what happened to another good general who wasn’t much for
administration, Alexander the Great. Also, neither of them ever conquered India. The Mongols succeeded primarily because of
their military skill. Genghis Khan’s army, which never numbered more than 130,000 was
built on speed and archery. Just like this guy. Mongol mounted archers were like super
fast tanks, compared to the foot soldiers and knights they were up against. But wait, all the military history nerds are
saying, once people knew that the Mongols were coming, why didn’t they just hole up
in castles and forts? It’s not like the Mongols had flying horses. EXCEPT THEY DID. They
didn’t? Stan, why are you always making history boring? So the Mongols apparently didn’t have flying
horses, but they were uncommonly adaptable. So even though they’d never seen a castle
before they started raiding, they became experts at siege warfare by interrogating prisoners.
And they also adopted gunpowder, probably introducing it to Europeans, and they even
built ships so they could attack Japan. That might have worked, too except there happened
to be a typhoon. Also, people were terrified of the Mongols.
Often cities would surrender the moment the Mongols arrived, just to escape slaughter.
But of course, that only happened because there were occasions when the Mongols, did,
you know, slaughter entire towns. So with all that background, let us return
to the question of Mongol awesomeness. First, five arguments for awesome.
1. The Mongols really did reinvigorate cross-Eurasian trade. The Silk Road trading routes that had
existed for about 1000 years by the time the Mongols made the scene had fallen into disuse,
but the Mongols valued trade because they could tax it, and they did a great job of
keeping their empire safe. It was said that a man could walk from one end of the Mongol
empire to the other with a gold plate on his head without ever fearing being robbed.
2. The Mongols increased communication throughout Eurasia by developing this pony express-like
system of way stations with horses and riders that could quickly relay information. It was
called the yam system and also included these amazing bronze passports, which facilitated
travel. 3. Another thing that travelled along the
Mongol trade routes was cuisine. For example, it was because of the Mongols that rice became
a staple of the Persian diet. Which I mention entirely because I happen to like Persian
food. 4. The Mongols forcibly relocated people who
were useful to them, like artists and musicians and, especially administrators. As you can
imagine, the Mongols weren’t much for administrative tasks like keeping records, so they found
people were good at that stuff and just moved them around the empire. This created the kind
of cross-cultural pollination that world historians these days get really excited about.
And 5. The Mongols were almost unprecedentedly tolerant of different religions. They themselves
were shamanists, believing in nature spirits, but since their religion was tied to the land
from which they came, they didn’t expect new people to adopt it and they didn’t ask
them to. So you could find Muslims and Buddhists and Christians and people of any other religion
you can think of prospering throughout the Mongol empire. And it’s that kind of openness
that has led some historians to go back and re-evaluate the Mongols, seeing them as kind
of a precursor to modernity. But there’s another side to the story that
we should not forget, so, here are five reasons why the Mongols might not be so great.
1. Here is Genghis Khan’s definition of happiness: “The greatest happiness is to
vanquish your enemies, to chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth, to see those
dear to them bathed in tears, to clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters.” Off-topic,
but if that quote rings a bell, it might be because Oliver Stone blatantly plagiarized
Genghis Khan in the movie Conan the Barbarian. 2. Is an extension of one. The Mongols were
seriously brutal conquerors. I mean, not uniquely brutal, but still: the Mongols destroyed entire
cities, and most historians estimate the numbers they killed to be in the millions.
3. Their empire didn’t last. Within 80 years they’d left China and been replaced by a
new dynasty, the Ming. And in Persia they blended in so completely that by the 15th
century they were totally unrecognizable. I mean, they’d even taken up agriculture!
Agriculture, the last refuge for scoundrels who want to devote their lives to working
instead of skoodilypooping. 4. They also weren’t particularly interested
in artistic patronage or architecture. I mean, your palace may last forever, but my yurt
can go anywhere. 5. The Mongols were probably responsible for
the Black Death. By opening up trade they also opened up vectors for disease to travel,
in the case of the Plague via fleas infected with Yersinia pestis. And at least according
to one story, the Mongols intentionally spread the plague by catapulting their plague-ridden
cadavers over the walls of Caffa in the Crimea. While this primitive act of biological warfare
might have happened, it’s unlikely to be what actually spread the plague. More likely
it was the fleas on the rats in the holds of Black Sea ships that were trading with Europe. But
that trade only existed because of the Mongols. All right Stan, one last time- cue the Mongol-tage. So the Mongols promoted trade, diversity,
and tolerance, and they also promoted slaughter and senseless destruction. And what you think
about the Mongols ends up saying a lot about you: Do you value artistic output over religious
diversity? Is imperialism that doesn’t last better or worse than imperialism that does?
And are certain kinds of warfare inherently wrong? If you think those are easy questions
to answer, than I haven’t been doing my job. Regardless, I look forward to reading your answers in
comments. Thanks for watching and I’ll see you next week. Crash Course is produced and directed by
Stan Muller. Our script supervisor is Danica Johnson. The show is written by my high school history
teacher Raoul Meyer and myself, and our Graphics Team is Thought Bubble. Last week’s Phrase
Of The Week was “Hawaiian Pizza”. If you want to suggest future phrases of the week or guess
at this week’s, you can do so in comments, where you can also ask questions about today’s
video that can be answered by our team of historians. By the way, if you want to wear
your love for Crash Course there’s a Mongols shirt, link in the video info. Thanks for watching Crash Course. Nobody can beat
Crash Course viewers. Well, except for the Mongols.

100 thoughts on “Wait For It…The Mongols!: Crash Course World History #17”

  1. Temujin was just surviving on the steppes with too many young siblings and very few friends and when he brought his fiancee home to marry, she gets stolen by some dudes. At that point, he could’ve let her go but Borte was more than a wife, she was his closest confidante and the only good thing going on in his life, not to mention the fact that he was also very sensitive about perceived slights against his manhood (his behavior around his way-more-manly brother reveals as much), so he was always gonna fight to get her back. The alliances he formed to do so led him to become Chinggis Khan, form the Mongol Empire and cause the deaths of millions. If Borte wasn’t stolen, who knows, he might’ve lived happily ever after without killing anyone (because of the time period and his ancestry, extremely unlikely but still).

    Moral of the story: Don’t steal someone else’s wife lol

    Source: The Secret History of the Mongols.

  2. 2012-John Green was not liberal enough for modern times of 2019. I'm surprised your cis-normative existence hasn't been stomped out for gender stereotyping the pink flippity-flop and pants on the Mongol.

  3. if the Mongols send a trading convoy to your country, whatever you do, do NOT kill the convoy. Iran learn that the hard way. ha ha, idiots!

  4. Genghis Khan said ''What would happen would happen and what that would be we do not know, only God knows''. He was a weirdo.

  5. Normally your gut sense, if you listen to it, can tell you if an educator is just trying to sell you a political narrative in the guise of an education. But I like that with John Green, I don't get that feeling.

  6. "Created Russia?" Nonsense. Nice spin on the Eastern Mongols being "woke ". East: good. West: bad. Does this vid have a safe space? I need one after this video.

  7. The conversion to Islam of the Mongol clan doms did not come with the conquest of Afghanistan or Iran because the religious belief system of Afghanistan and Iran were in rebellion and to follow a religion of a group of people who were in rebellion against the khan would lead to stigmatization from your peers and in some cases the revoking of your klanship. It came with the conquest of china and the tarmin were muslims and Buddhist were not as rebellious.

  8. Until China is still communist and until siberia is still a part of russia…Mongolia cannot be great again.. Its trapped … !!!! When China becomes a republic and Siberia becomes weak division of independent republics Mongolia can rise and be so great again… Wishing for that day.

  9. "I've conquered for you, a large empire. But my life was too short to take the whole world that I leave to you."

    -Genghis Khan

  10. It's important to remember that while Genghis' definition of happiness sounds maniacal, because it is, almost every conqueror in history either openly and not held the save views. Alenxader the Great may have claimed to spread civilization, but in reality he very obviously simply liked winning battles and vanquishing enemies. Him chasing Darius all over the empire is a good example. Napoleon also wanted nothing else than glory of victory and the pleasure at destroying his enemies. My personal view is that all three of those were blood-thirsy maniacs, but one way or another, one cannot admire the latter two and say that Genghis Khan was a terrible person. That would be hypocritical.

  11. Neither of them conquered India , yeah no we really had a robust well built defensive system.

    Which the yknow no one ever invaded. Except the Ghazni, the ghoris , the British , the Mughals, the .


  12. John killed Danny for slaughtering only one City.
    but here's are the Mongols,
    sorry I forgot Mongols are the exception.

    when your favorite author loves your country's food 😭😍😭😍😭😍😭😍

  14. You are a historian? I thought u were an author and the 3rd best economist among all C students in the Alabama state academic decathlon in 1994…

  15. The mongols sound kinda like the Dothraki
    The mongols conquered north Eurasia and if you look at the GOT map the Dothraki sea looks a lot like Eurasia
    Plus they’re both horse riding nomads
    And Khan sounds a lot like Khal to me

  16. So, um, i’m from Russia and know history of my country so to clarify… Mongols didn’t create Russia. They came in the 13th century to a country that was doing just fine for a few centuries already. If we really try to say who “created” Russia, we can say that “varyags” or vikings helped establish a government (although some historians argue on that) in the 9th century.

  17. Why don't they teach us about this in world history in high school. They taught us the biggest empires were the Roman and the Persian

  18. Title is wait for it…..mongols. Anyone who knows anything about the mongolian empire knows if you wait for them you become an easier target for their chosen tactics.

  19. Oh please don't try to humanize the mongols those were most certainly tge most beasty thing to ever exist under the name of humanity

  20. They didn't had any stronge religion of their own so it simply didn't mattered to them if people were practising their own religions also this doesn't cover for how horrible they were

  21. White people being true assholes in the comments by saying biased things about mongols just because they weren't directly affected by their brutality and their barbaric war crimes

  22. After some thought, I think I have answers to your questions, Mr. Green. First, you shouldn't value artistic output over religious diversity or vice versa. You should try to have both. They are both equally important to culture and advancement. Second, imperialism that doesn't last is better than imperialism that does last. The idea of humanity united under one banner sounds nice but one empire with a certain set of laws and traditions doesn't. What I mean is, look at American culture. American culture is imperialising most other countries and weeding out other cultures. It's killing cultural diversity and we can't afford to lose such an important piece of the world. Having one lifestyle coming from one dominant empire is going to destroy this world. It's better if we let each country carry out their own traditions and ways without forcibly making it follow one dominant empire. Lastly, I wouldn't know about warfare. However, yes,I do agree that certain types are wrong. Martin Luther King proved that people can fight for what they believe in without violence. If all of us could follow that example, then humanity wouldn't be such a terrible race. Listening to all this talk of nukes just makes me pity the world leaders and think that they either need a heart or need to remember what world peace actually looks like. Well, all that being said, I hope to hear your thoughts on my long-winded yet not debate team worthy argument. Thanks for reading!!!!

  23. New Quote of the Week: He that comforts my wife is the cherisher of my flesh and blood; he that cherishes my flesh and blood loves my flesh and blood; he that loves my flesh and blood is my friend; ergo, he that kisses my wife is my friend.
    — William Shakespeare, All's Well that Ends Well, 1603


  25. Just to remind you that the Great Wall of China wasn't great at all.. The Mongols and few more empires had destroyed it like a piece of cake..

  26. Although those are not easy questions to answer- I would say I do value artistic output over religious diversity (although there's evidence that the mongols had both), I think empires are bound to collapse, so a short lived one is just as good as a long term one, and I think conflict is not only natural, but in some cases necessary, so it would be silly to qualify any of it as inherently wrong.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *