Japan—Earthquakes & Tectonics (Educational)

80% of earthquakes worldwide occur around
the circum-Pacific region chiefly along the subduction-zone boundaries, known as the “Pacific
Ring of Fire”, so named because of the more than 400 active volcanoes that occur there.
The earthquake and volcano belt sweeps through Japan where about 20% of worldwide measured
earthquakes occur. There are more than 100,000 earthquakes recorded in Japan every year.
Of those about 1,500 are strong enough for people to notice. By examining the pattern
of seismic activity of all earthquakes greater than magnitude 4 since 2011, we see the expected
patterns of shallow to deep earthquakes along the subduction zones.
Over 100 major earthquakes of M7 or larger have occurred in the past century. Japan also
has over 100 active volcanoes. along a volcanic arc that lies parallel to oceanic trenches,
both distinctive features of convergent margins. . 1
Earthquakes, volcanoes, and trenches all result from Japan being wedged among four major tectonic
plates. The Pacific Plate subducts beneath the Okhotsk Plate at the Japan Trench. The
rate of convergence is 8.3 cm/yr at the location shown. The Philippine Sea Plate subducts beneath
central and southwest Japan at the Sagami Trough, the Nankai Trough, and the Ryukyu
Trench. At the location shown, subduction is somewhat oblique at 4.5 cm/yr. A complex
structure accommodates slow east-west convergence between the Okhotsk and Eurasian plates.
Northwest-directed forces due to subduction, plus East-West-oriented compression between
the Eurasian and Okhokst plates. complicate the region.”
Lets go back millions of years and exaggerate the tectonics. Now we can see Oblique subduction
pushing a forearc crustal block to the west at a rate of about one half cm/yr). A right-lateral
strike-slip fault, called the Median Tectonic Line, accommodates most of that motion within
the Eurasian Plate. In this region that includes Kyoto, the Imperial
Capital of Japan for more than one thousand years, the earthquake history since the mid-1800s
demonstrates that major crustal-fault earthquakes in this region occur about every 15 years.
The most recent example is The Great Hanshin earthquake of 1995, commonly referred to as
the Kobe earthquake.” Before dawn on January 17, 1995, a right-lateral
strike-slip fault ruptured 20 km to the southwest and 30 km to the northeast from a hypocenter
at about 15 km depth. Fault displacement was 3 meters at the hypocenter and 1 meter at
10 km depth beneath Kobe, a port city with population of 1.5 million.
Although this magnitude 6.9 earthquake released less than 1/1000 th of the energy released
during the 2011 Tohoku-oki subduction zone earthquake, Severe ground shaking and resulting
damage was concentrated at locations underlain by weak, water-saturated sediment and artificial
Fill along and within Osaka Bay. Traditional style houses with a heavy clay-tile
roof were vulnerable to collapse while failures of individual stories or the entire structure
affected some multistory buildings. Hundreds of fires ignited and firefighting efforts
were hampered by failures of the water supply and transportation system. Over 100,000 buildings
were destroyed leaving 300,000 homeless. Sections of the elevated Hanshin Expressway that opened
in 1962 collapsed. Most structures completed after 1981 when building codes were updated,
survived with minimal damage. This earthquake forced a reassessment for tall buildings and
transportation infrastructure. Now let’s look at cross sections of the
subduction zones. In northernmost Honshu, the oceanic Pacific Plate dives beneath the
continental Okhotsk Plate. Here we see how earthquakes outline the subduction geometry.
To 70 km depth, thrust-faulting earthquakes are concentrated at the contact between the
plates where megathrust events, often associated with tsunamis, are generated. Deformation
of the overriding plate generates shallow intra-plate earthquakes. Below 70 km depth,
earthquakes occur only within the subducting plate. Earthquakes in this subduction zone
reach extreme depths of over 500+ km because the Pacific Plate is ~150 Ma old and therefore
very cold when it starts to subduct. Plus, the rate of subduction is fairly rapid at
over 8 cm/yr so the oceanic plate is still cool and brittle at depth.
A cross section through central Honshu shows a slightly steeper subduction angle, thus
the volcanoes are closer to the trench. At the Ryukyu Trench, the angle of subduction
is similar to Central Honshu , but the subduction rate is slower, and the max depth of earthquakes
is only 300 km. “By the late 1800s, written accounts and
the beginnings of seismology provide reasonably accurate information on the location and size
of earthquakes off the northeast coast of Honshu.  Running at five years per second,
this animation shows the earthquake history of magnitude 7.4 or larger earthquakes on
the subduction zone boundary between the Pacific and Okhotsk plates from 1896 through 2010. 
This history led to the impression that earthquakes on this plate boundary do not exceed magnitude
8.2.  That maximum earthquake magnitude and associated tsunami size became the basis for
emergency management, including coastal tsunami defenses.”
Some geoscientists observed that the displacement between the Pacific and Okhotsk plates during
earthquakes of the past few centuries was much less than the relative plate motion. 
They were concerned the subduction zone might be storing elastic energy over many centuries
that could be released in a massive earthquake. On March 11 2011, the Tohoku-oki magnitude
9 earthquake ruptured a 500-kilometer-long by 200-kilometer-wide area of the plate boundary
over an interval of three minutes. Extreme ground shaking affected coastal towns of northeastern
Honshu and strong shaking lasted for 6 minutes in Tokyo.
Superior construction practices and earthquake preparedness impressively mitigated damage
from ground shaking during this earthquake confirming that Japanese cities often shake
but they rarely topple. Unfortunately, the tsunami generated by the Tohoku-oki earthquake
reached greater heights and much farther inland than had been anticipated for tsunamis in
this area. To understand the 2011 tsunami, let’s view
the earthquake rupture process in cross section. Rupture initiated at the hypocenter, 24 km
beneath the seafloor, then propagated both up-dip to the east and down-dip to the west.
Maximum fault displacement reached 40 meters at a location 50 km from the Japan trench
then decreased to 20 m at the trench. These are the largest fault displacements documented
for any earthquake in history. Elastic rebound during the earthquake caused stations along
the coast nearest the epicenter to jump east by as much as 4.4 meters or 14.5 feet. Seafloor
uplift reached 7 meters above the zone of maximum fault displacement while the seafloor
dropped by 2 meters between the epicenter and the coast. Most of the coastal area subsided
during the earthquake. That vertical displacement of the ocean floor produced the tsunami that
rushed onshore within 20 minutes of the earthquake. In coastal areas where seafloor bathymetry
and onshore topography focused wave energy, the tsunami reached elevations of 40 meters,
or 130 feet, above sea level. Although 96% of citizens successfully evacuated the tsunami
inundation zone, nearly 20,000 lives were lost in this, the most costly natural disaster
in Japan’s history. Centuries of written accounts from this region
reported earthquakes and tsunamis, but gave only vague hints about past events as large
as the 2011 event.  However, a decade before, geoscientists searching sedimentary layers
upslope of the coast reported tsunami geology evidence for a similar earthquake in 869 A.D..
Unfortunately, debate about this tsunami geology was still ongoing when the 2011 earthquake
and tsunami struck. This painful lesson taught us that the subduction zone between the Pacific
and Okhotsk plates, and probably others worldwide, can store elastic energy over 1000-year intervals
then release that energy in just a few minutes during massive earthquakes. As towns in northeast
Honshu devastated by the 2011 tsunami are being rebuilt, changes in coastal land-use
practices are being implemented to decrease the number of people living and working in
vulnerable near-shore areas. In this and many other ways, Japan continues to advance earthquake
and tsunami preparedness.

18 thoughts on “Japan—Earthquakes & Tectonics (Educational)”

  1. Great content, really enjoyed it! 🙂 Just the city in 7.01s, it looks like the view from Victoria Peak HK.

  2. This is an excellent video I will surely use in a Hazards course I am teaching this fall. I like it so much that I hate to nitpick, but I do have a comment that the info on the Tohoku maximum slip (at about time 7:30 to 7:50 in the video) doesn't match the consensus view of what happened during the earthquake. Specifically, numerous studies show that the peak slip was larger and much closer to the trench and probably didn't decrease much up-dip (I can provide some refs if you like; see many pubs by e.g. Kelin Wang for overview).

  3. Very informative. While this video primarily focusses on Japan, I believe it should be noted that most subduction zones in the world could potentially generate close to or above magnitude 9 earthquakes. Kamchatka 1952: M9.0, Chile 1960: M 9.5, Alaska 1964: M 9.2, Sumatra 2004: M 9.3, Chile 2010: M 8.8. A less known subduction zone is located on the Azores Cape St. Vincent Ridge between the Azores Islands and Portugal. It is estimated that the 1755 earthquake had a magnitude between 8.7 and 9.0.

  4. Upwards of 30,000 lost and 6 communities still haven't been rebuilt. Its going to be 1 big bugger to get the west Coast of NA up to these types of building codes and towns moved inland.

  5. Great tutorial video. Thank you. Just one thing – the photo appears at 6:59 (the image before the other photo with Mount Fuji) is Hong Kong, not Japan.

  6. As a geotechnical engineer living in a seismically active zone, I found this presentation very interesting and informative. A nice balance between accessibility and technical content. Well done!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *