how about the statementsAliens speak EnglishSplot is alienTherefore, Splot speaks EnglishIt is confirmed valid but Americans also speak English? Must be invalid or i just dont get it?
CrossFit sent me here. Weird.
Will Smith, will smithI will smithTherefor I am Will Smith
A valid argument isn't always a meaningful argument.
All humans are mortal. My dog Max is mortal. Therefore, my dog Max is a human. Therefore, invalid argument.
Are whiteboard animation videos still valid?
Had an assignment for my ethics class and this helped so much. I was struggling for an hour until I found this video. Thank you!
Red bull is my fuelKerosene is a fuel So redbull = kerosene,
Peter Griffin , ( family Guy)
All rats are mortal.Socrates is mortal.Therefore, Socrates is a rat.
*Rage Quits life.
This was so clear to me, thanks for the video. I understand now.
Valid:A is B (coffee is a bean)B is C (bean is a food)Therefore A is C (coffee is a food)Invalid:A has B (dogs have fur)C has B (Claire has fur)Therefore C is A (Claire is a dog)
Depends on how many chairs to begin with.
shout out to all my fellow university students trying to get by in there philosophy course
Who else’s class got cancelled
invalid. the conclusion is dubious.
Invalid, and thank you a hundred times.
thank you so much for helping students like me
Invalid Tho This Helps Me Out Thank you
I can't understand this thing and I have an exam tomorrow T_T
Invalid be cause all fruits are a chair but some chairs could be fruits. Therefore chairs are chairs.
I love this video
Invalid, two objects that share one property doesn't make them identical as the property is not defined as property describing all properties of the object.
HUGE HUGE HUGE fan of yours. PLEASE never stop doing videos. There is a type of fallacy im hearing theists accuse me of. Can you help me with it? (Or someone else familiar with logical fallacies?)
how valid can a definition of validity be if guessed at for all we know arbitrarily in the first place, etc…tks for posting the thought provokin' vid.
Way better than my professor
Oh! I know this one! Invalid! This is the fallacy of affirming the consequent or fallacy of the converse, if you will! 😀
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.