I am a 6th grade teacher and am excited to have these videos at my fingertips. I will be creating lessons based on these as they are language heavy for 12 year olds and would need some supporting materials. Critical work for all school children. Thank you!
I'm watching this series again. I wanna be a better critical thinker. I have learned a lot from watching this show. David is a great teacher!
David… = genious!
“If a train leaves the station”….. actually these are great videos. You’re educating and I love it 🖤
Where’s that group theory playlist boi?
if you dont know this stuff you cant pass the second grade standardize test dont you pay attention to how our school system works at all now
you also find this stuff on the SATs you should take the SATs again and make sure its still on it because i took it in 07
you do realize scishow kids already uploaded all of this stuff because they are teaching children not at grade level so second graders are now doing 5th grade work and 5th graders are getting ready to do calculus
if you dont know physics by 7th grade you are behind and you need to pass the standardize test and it has physics in it
thx for this ha bisky vid anyways even though everybody knows this stuff and what you should go over is what jimmy dore does and why the dictionary is so important
This one should be the first episode of critical thinking series
what evidence do you have>? support you are claim davd
What about abductive arguments, which are also used in hypotheses? When one of the premises is just plausible, but the other is for sure, but this makes the conclusion just plausible as well. For example:P1: These candies are white.P2: This jar only contains white candies.C: These candies are from this jar.(This form of reasoning was rediscovered by Charles Sanders Peirce.)
You break the rules you hide behind, Pakman….
I want copies of this series. I want to gift it, how can I do that?
Very good series and I like the topic being presented. However, I like to add that although inductive reasoning could be used in arguments that are more flexible and therefore have conclusions that are not inevitable particularly if the original premise changes or new premises are added, inductive reasoning could still be used in objective arguments particularly if it involves math such as when attempting to interpolate data to discover a formula or curve on a graph.
….these are gonna get more in depth right? Pretty surface level so far.
Will this be on the test?
Excellent David. When do we get to St. Anselm's ontological argument?
Forgot validity and soundness…
is it weird if i started thinking like this in gr 8 or so without someone telling me about it?
I'd like to hear more how deductive reasoning depends on objectivity. Never heard that, but it seems innate to correct reasoning, but lacking such statement. Thank you! Cheers!
Thanks for doing this. I learned some of this stuff years ago in college and have forgotten a lot of the details. This is like a refresher.
Pretty basic stuff. It's like I'm taking examen philosophicum all over again.
you'll never reach 1M subs with this kind of sh*t. this is tedious
There are many Boston's. Aren't they?
Hang in there Pakman. Emotional maturity isn't a skill to be mastered; it's something arrived at over time with experience.
You will be tested on this class.
Great video guys. Can't wait for more
That beaker was trippin me out as it was continuously growing larger 😂
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.